When one family member wants to keep a property and the others want cash, the arithmetic has to be built before the conversation. Here is how it is done.
An inherited property with several entitled parties usually resolves one of two ways: it is sold and the proceeds divided, or one party buys out the others. The second looks simple and is where most disagreements happen, because people compare a buyout price against a sale price without adjusting for the costs and risks that a sale would carry. This worked example builds the comparison properly. All figures are illustrative.
The situation
A villa forms part of an estate with four entitled parties. One of them, who lives in the Kingdom, wants to acquire the whole property. The other three, two of whom live abroad, want to realise their shares. The question is what a fair buyout price looks like compared with selling the property on the open market and dividing the proceeds.
Assumptions (illustrative)
- Accredited valuation of the property: SAR 4,000,000 (illustrative).
- Four parties with illustrative shares of 40, 20, 20 and 20 per cent.
- Estimated costs of an open market sale: agency, marketing and preparation at an assumed SAR 160,000 in total.
- Assumed time to achieve an open market sale: nine months.
- Assumed holding costs during that period: SAR 4,500 per month for upkeep, utilities and security.
- Assumed discount rate for comparing money now with money later: 5 per cent per year.
Step 1: Calculate the gross value of each share
At a valuation of SAR 4,000,000, the 40 per cent share is worth SAR 1,600,000 and each 20 per cent share is worth SAR 800,000.
This is the starting point and the number everyone arrives with. It is a gross figure that assumes the money appears today at no cost, which is precisely what an open market sale does not do.
Step 2: Work out what an open market sale would actually net
Sale proceeds of SAR 4,000,000 less costs of SAR 160,000 and nine months of holding costs at SAR 4,500, which is SAR 40,500, leaves SAR 3,799,500. A 20 per cent share of that is SAR 759,900.
The realistic alternative for a selling party is about SAR 759,900, not SAR 800,000. The difference of SAR 40,100 per 20 per cent share is the cost of the process they would have to go through.
Step 3: Adjust for the time value of waiting nine months
SAR 759,900 received in nine months, discounted at 5 per cent per year, is approximately SAR 732,000. Against the undiscounted figure, waiting costs roughly SAR 27,900 per 20 per cent share.
A buyout paid now is worth more than the same sum paid after a sale completes. This is the strongest argument available to the buying party and the one most often left unstated.
Step 4: Set the negotiating range
The floor for a selling party is about SAR 732,000 per 20 per cent share, being the discounted net sale outcome. The ceiling is SAR 800,000, being the gross share value. The range is therefore roughly SAR 68,000 wide per 20 per cent share.
Both sides now have a defined range instead of two incompatible single numbers. Negotiation inside a range tends to conclude; negotiation between two anchors tends not to.
Step 5: Price the certainty premium
If the parties settle at SAR 770,000 per 20 per cent share, the buying party pays SAR 2,310,000 for the three shares. That is SAR 30,000 above the discounted alternative for each selling party, or SAR 90,000 in total above the floor.
The buying party is paying SAR 90,000 for certainty and speed, and avoiding SAR 160,000 of sale costs plus the risk that the market moves. On these assumptions the trade favours the buyer while still paying the sellers more than their realistic alternative.
Step 6: Test whether the buying party can fund it
SAR 2,310,000 must be funded. If the buying party raises 60 per cent of the property value, being SAR 2,400,000, against the asset once consolidated, the buyout is covered with SAR 90,000 to spare before financing costs.
A buyout only works if the money exists. Agreeing a price that cannot be funded wastes months and usually ends in the open market sale that everyone was trying to avoid, by which point relations have deteriorated.
What changes the answer
- If the sale were expected to take eighteen months rather than nine, the discounted floor falls to roughly SAR 705,000 per 20 per cent share and the buying party position strengthens considerably.
- If sale costs were SAR 100,000 rather than SAR 160,000, the floor rises to about SAR 740,000 and the negotiating range narrows.
- If the valuation were SAR 4,400,000, every figure scales by 10 per cent and the absolute gap between floor and ceiling widens to roughly SAR 75,000 per 20 per cent share.
- If one selling party will not accept a discount for certainty, the buying party may be better acquiring two shares and living with a continuing co-owner.
- If financing is unavailable, the whole structure collapses to an open market sale regardless of what price the parties agree.
What the numbers tell you
- Compare a buyout against the net, discounted alternative rather than against the headline valuation.
- Sale costs and holding costs are real and belong in the comparison from the first conversation.
- A defined negotiating range produces settlements; two single numbers produce stalemates.
- Certainty and speed have a price, and naming it openly makes the negotiation shorter.
- Confirm funding before agreeing a price, because an unfunded agreement costs more than no agreement.
Limits of this example
Every figure above is an illustrative assumption used to show the method, not a quote, valuation or market rate. Costs, rates, fees and regulations change and must be confirmed with the relevant authority, lender or supplier before you commit.
Domira works on the ownership side of a Saudi property for owners based abroad: verifying title and boundaries, assessing the building, handling registration and handover, and managing the asset afterwards. For legal and tax questions, work with a licensed adviser; Domira will tell you plainly what the property itself supports.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do you value a share in an inherited property?
Start from a valuation of the whole property prepared by an accredited valuer, apply the share proportion, then adjust for what a sale would actually cost and how long it would take. The gross proportion is the headline; the net discounted figure is the realistic alternative a selling party faces, and that is what a buyout is competing against.
Is it cheaper to buy out the other heirs than to sell the property?
Often yes for the buying party, because a sale carries agency and preparation costs plus months of holding costs and market risk, all of which come off the proceeds everyone shares. Build both numbers before negotiating. Whether the arithmetic favours a buyout in your case depends entirely on the assumptions you can evidence.
Should we get a formal valuation before agreeing a family buyout?
Yes, from an accredited valuer, because it moves the conversation off opinion. The valuation does not settle the price by itself, since the costs and timing of the alternative still have to be applied, but it gives everyone the same starting number, which is usually what a family negotiation is missing.
Have a Property Question?
Domira can help you navigate property, financing and investment decisions in Saudi Arabia. Speak with our team for an initial consultation.


